LHC@home

Good thing time was spent on changing the look and feel of the web site, rather than fixing the servers.

They succeeded at making the upgrade even harder; now they have to merge the new look changes with the thousand changes from the official code. Seriously, that was totally the wrong order.

I tell you what I'll do my job and you do yours mmm'kay?

The quota has been altered. We've been talking to the scientists about the workflow and at the moment they are unsure whether it will be more constant when we know you'll know

Oh dear, he's told them off now hasn't he.

Zombie and PovAddict you've got the wrong impression. What they are trying to achieve here is more like art or perhaps a fashion statement... a marvel of modern engineering juxtaposed beside a quaint little BOINC server, sub-atomic particles whirring about at close to c beside server that just trundles along ka-bump, ka-bump, kabump. Relax! Breathe in the ambience. I'll put Mario Lanza on the phonograph if you'll crank the handle. We'll make up lies to tell our grand-children about how you and I, greatest particle fizzicists in the world, found der Higgs.

Now that we have this beautiful new website that does nothing the old one didn't we are sure to attract zillions of new crunchers to crunch work we're not too sure will ever exist. Ingenious!! Ahh, here it is... Mario singing Whutderfuk Ist Bain Happenink Dis Plaze.

"Thats right, seems like he conducts. I looked around and discovered that Dagorath is arguing (quite unkind) with other users in several other project forums (i.e. ABC@home, BOINC,...). And that he´s unhappy with the way of some projects are managed (i.e. QMC@home), so why you don't get your own project instead?"


Seems like squealing, but i had to quote this nice post of Dagorath from the ABC@Home forum:

Agreed! Now it's time to battle waste and retarded thinking at LHC where Neasan has sunk his own ship as I suspected he eventually would.

It all adds up to, you can't/won't answer the question that started this thread so you attack the man/men who asked it and try to destroy his/their credibility.

Dagorath may or may not be guilty of what you accuse him of, however, it's irrelevant.

Answer the question and don't attack the people who asked it!

I hope you can communicate with your fellow scientists better than Neasan and yourself have communicated with Dagorath and I or the possibility of a disaster on the Swiss/French border in 2008 becomes a lot more likely.

:) thanks Dagorath ;) never say die, LOL.
Regards
Masud.

Good to hear from you again, Masud ;)

I think some people just don't want their secret method for insuring that they get WUs to be made public.