|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
rss feeds are down
(Message 21941)
Posted 4 Mar 2010 by  1fast6
Post: your link for rss feeds is down and has been for quite some time... I posted this a couple of months ago, but apparently it was deleted or moved... it would certainly help to get out the word that you have work flowing again... |
|
2)
Message boards :
LHC@home Science :
problems with News rss feed
(Message 21480)
Posted 22 Aug 2009 by 1fast6
Post: rss feed appears to be offline.. Warning: fsockopen() [function.fsockopen]: unable to connect to lhcathome.cern.ch:80 (Connection timed out) in [path]/includes/class_rss_poster.php on line 98 |
|
3)
Message boards :
Team invites :
OCDistributed
(Message 14518)
Posted 11 Aug 2006 by 1fast6
Post:  OCDistributed... A team and forum for those who like computers and distributed computing projects. We are a very small team of dedicated DC'ers... though small as we are, we pack quite a DC punch... but still small enough that YOU can make a difference... join the OCDistributed LHC team... LINK... visit the OCDistributed forum... LINK... |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
I think we should restrict work units
(Message 13948)
Posted 11 Jun 2006 by 1fast6
Post: 1fast6: Haven't you read that the projects big idea for the moment is to NOT release work all the time. Is it any sense to waste computer time for meaningless crunching? I guess it depends on your definition of meaningless crunching... all I know is I could have done SOMETHING to contribute this past week... ok, so how about, continue to release workunits that remain in "active status", until the results are validated...
do we really know that the servers are waiting for stragglers? Or, could they be waiting for their own analysis to complete in order to build the next work units based on the work completed. [/quote] heck,I dunno if they're stragglers, but the server status has looked pretty much like this all weekend... Server Status I'm just assuming there a just a few workunits hung up in limbo somewhere, just waiting for the third submission to validate the results... but maybe I'm wrong... |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
I think we should restrict work units
(Message 13940)
Posted 11 Jun 2006 by 1fast6
Post: well, I joined the project over a week ago, just to watch all of my machines sit idle... very frustrating... I wonder if the admins would consider setting it up to continuously release work, and the first 3 that are returned that validate get full credit(I assume this project uses a triple validate for credit system) .. the stragglers get less (or is that a boinc controlled issue)... it would seem that would get them the results they need quicker and give us all something to do, while rewarding those who get the work in quickest (and not rewarding those who hoard work)... its painful to watch the servers wait for a timeout for less than 30 workunits to be returned... |
©2024 CERN