|
1)
Message boards :
Theory Application :
Native Theory and macOS
(Message 38594)
Posted 20 Apr 2019 by STE\/E Post: steve@pboyztoy99:~$ wget https://ecsft.cern.ch/dist/cvmfs/cvmfs-release/cvmfs-release-latest_all.deb --2019-04-20 18:57:14-- https://ecsft.cern.ch/dist/cvmfs/cvmfs-release/cvmfs-release-latest_all.deb Resolving ecsft.cern.ch (ecsft.cern.ch)... 188.184.161.78 Connecting to ecsft.cern.ch (ecsft.cern.ch)|188.184.161.78|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 4724 (4.6K) Saving to: ‘cvmfs-release-latest_all.deb.1’ cvmfs-release-lates 100%[===================>] 4.61K --.-KB/s in 0s 2019-04-20 18:57:16 (10.3 MB/s) - ‘cvmfs-release-latest_all.deb.1’ saved [4724/4724] steve@pboyztoy99:~$ sudo dpkg -i cvmfs-release-latest_all.deb [sudo] password for steve: Sorry, try again. [sudo] password for steve: (Reading database ... 167330 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack cvmfs-release-latest_all.deb ... Unpacking cvmfs-release (2.1-2) over (2.1-2) ... Setting up cvmfs-release (2.1-2) ... steve@pboyztoy99:~$ cvmfs_config setup root privileges required steve@pboyztoy99:~$ iceman48458 iceman48458: command not found steve@pboyztoy99:~$ sed -i 's%#+dir:/etc/auto.master.d%+dir:/etc/auto.master.d%' /etc/auto.master sed: couldn't open temporary file /etc/sedGH6pZ3: Permission denied steve@pboyztoy99:~$ systemctl restart autofs |
|
2)
Message boards :
Theory Application :
Native Theory and macOS
(Message 38592)
Posted 20 Apr 2019 by STE\/E Post: lsof /var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend... doesn't show or do anything when entered in the terminal steve@pboyztoy99:~$ sudo wget https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/download/default.local -O /etc/cvmfs/default.local [sudo] password for steve: --2019-04-20 14:11:25-- https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/download/default.local Resolving lhcathome.cern.ch (lhcathome.cern.ch)... 137.138.156.174 Connecting to lhcathome.cern.ch (lhcathome.cern.ch)|137.138.156.174|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 191 Saving to: ‘/etc/cvmfs/default.local’ /etc/cvmfs/default. 100%[===================>] 191 --.-KB/s in 0s 2019-04-20 14:11:26 (6.42 MB/s) - ‘/etc/cvmfs/default.local’ saved [191/191] steve@pboyztoy99:~$ sudo cvmfs_config reload steve@pboyztoy99:~$ cvmfs_config probe Probing /cvmfs/atlas.cern.ch... Failed! Probing /cvmfs/atlas-condb.cern.ch... Failed! Probing /cvmfs/grid.cern.ch... Failed! Probing /cvmfs/cernvm-prod.cern.ch... Failed! Probing /cvmfs/sft.cern.ch... Failed! Probing /cvmfs/alice.cern.ch... Failed! steve@pboyztoy99:~$ |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Can't set Project Preferences ?
(Message 32035)
Posted 22 Aug 2017 by STE\/E Post: http://lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch/sixtrack/prefs.php?subset=project Thats the url I'm attached to now: Computer: PBOYZTOYNP98732 Project LHC@home General Master URL https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/ User name STE\/E Team BlackOps Venue Resource share 100 |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Can't set Project Preferences ?
(Message 32032)
Posted 22 Aug 2017 by STE\/E Post: which url are you trying to access the preferences with? http://lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch/sixtrack/prefs.php?subset=project |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Can't set Project Preferences ?
(Message 32029)
Posted 21 Aug 2017 by STE\/E Post: Still doesn't answer my question of why I can't edit my Preferences. it's at 100% right now & I have no way of changing that to something else like 50% or whatever I want it to be. |
|
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Can't set Project Preferences ?
(Message 32026)
Posted 21 Aug 2017 by STE\/E Post: Why isn't there an option to set your Project Preferences like Resource Share. When I go to my Project Preferences there's no Option to Edit the Preferences ? |
|
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
information should not be that difficult
(Message 9789)
Posted 31 Aug 2005 by STE\/E Post: you have a credit advantage too from what i've heard...have never calculated it as i am not too worried about credits ========== Most definitely you get more Credit at the CPDN Site for the amount of work you do & time spent doing it. I've run all the Projects at one time or another & when I do I usually throw all my Computers at it 100% of the time and run the Project 24/7 for at least 1 month or more to get an idea what kind of Credit they give out. Heres what I came up with by doing that for me anyway & with the amount of Computers I have ... These are a Per Day average Credit Amount ... 1. Seti = 4400-4500 2. CPDN = 3900-4000 3. All the rest of the Projects are about in the same group ... LHC-Predictor-Einstein-Sztaki-Message all are about 2200-2500 range ... 4. BURP I don't know about because I haven't really run it enough & they haven't released enough work to do to get a true average ... All though I like my Credit as much as the next guy it isn't an end all for me as you can see by my Signature I've gave all the Projects considerable Processing time. Right now I'm running SZTAKI & Message@Home & plan to for the foreseeable future because they both have 4 day deadlines so they don't conflict to much with each other if I give them both the same amount of Resource Share ... :) |
|
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Message@home down.-info!
(Message 9687)
Posted 28 Aug 2005 by STE\/E Post: The Thread Cori is talking about is Here ... :) |
|
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Bug in the Credit addition
(Message 9426)
Posted 16 Aug 2005 by STE\/E Post: Hey PoorBoy are you still LURKING around these parts? I thought the last test of beta workunits you did sent you wayyyyyy down the collider tubes.....hehehe... ========= hehe...Ya, I drop in once in awhile to see whats going on. I've been hitting some of the other Projects WU's for awhile. I get restless staying in one place to long ... ;) |
|
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credits
(Message 9423)
Posted 16 Aug 2005 by STE\/E Post: Congratulations Saeger, you've won the WOTW Award ... Well earned if I say so myself ... |
|
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Bug in the Credit addition
(Message 9421)
Posted 16 Aug 2005 by STE\/E Post: I even crunch for betas without any credit. But this here is just disgusting. ========= If it's so Disgusting to you why don't you just go processes some WU's from another Project thats less Disgusting to you... |
|
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Upgrading BOINC
(Message 8848)
Posted 23 Jul 2005 by STE\/E Post: Like Heff I've run Zone Alarm Pro all my computers for some years now without any problems. I think most problems come from people not getting it configured right, I know it took me a little while to figure it all out but once I did it's run without a hitch ... |
|
13)
Message boards :
Cafe LHC :
Pirates@home is over!
(Message 8175)
Posted 25 Jun 2005 by STE\/E Post: LB, I thought they were going to keep the Site open over the weekend to allow people to finish what WU's they had and return them, I came home from work yesterday with a mess of finished WU's & no way to upload or report them. What are we supposed to do with them, just reset the Project or ??? |
|
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Old work still stuck in
(Message 8145)
Posted 20 Jun 2005 by STE\/E Post: > I invalidated these manually, I hope I got it right now (on the first try I > crashed the whole database:( ) ========= Thanks Markku for cleaning out the old WU's ... :) |
|
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New version of Boinc
(Message 8112)
Posted 18 Jun 2005 by STE\/E Post: Are we advancing?, are we just stucked somewhere? Well let us know. If things continue this way I'll just think about it twice before continueing with LHC. ========== Such is Life at the LHC Project Liberto, it's a classic case of hurry up and wait ... ;) |
|
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New version of Boinc
(Message 8104)
Posted 17 Jun 2005 by STE\/E Post: should be doing the project with the highest debt ========== That word debt is a pet peeve of mine Paul, why is there a debt, if I don't want to run a Project for 6 months thats my decision I feel. When I decide to run that Project again I don't feel I owe it anything because I didn't run it for 6 months ... But the Client feels differently I guess, it feels I've been a naughty boy for not running that Project for so long and now wants to force me to run it ... Thats why I only stay attached to the Projects I want to run & I even suspend some of them to run exactly what I want to run & not what the Client wants me to run ... |
|
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New version of Boinc
(Message 8078)
Posted 15 Jun 2005 by STE\/E Post: I have had a host sitting there with no work requesting no work because (I beleive) my resource share for LHC was too high even though I had no LHC work. ========== I find that quite normal for the Client, I have the same problem because I usually run LHC at a 99% - 100% Resource share setting. If I run out of LHC WU's I have to back LHC off in order to get more work from some of the other Projects ... I've even received messages from the other Projects that there was work available but because blah blah blah (basically the other projects are telling me I'm not running a high enough Resource share for that Project for them to send me any work) ... Then as soon as I back off LHC I get some work from the other Projects ... |
|
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
first bunch done... now what?
(Message 8073)
Posted 14 Jun 2005 by STE\/E Post: CPDN is by far the highest...look who is highest in total boincstat numbers its most cpdn some seti mixed in...they went from 75 credits per trickle to 95 now far exceeding all other projects ... believe the consistency of the #s allows it to outproduce seti by at least 3-5% =========== Yes, CPDN gives a very good return for your time spent processing WU's, but you have to consider the amount of computers some of these people are running also. Some of the people at the top of the total BOINC Stats have so many computers that they could run any Project and still be at the top of the Total Stats Lists. Even though I've managed to stay in the top 200 Total Project Stats with just only 7 PC's through sheer consistency by running them 24/7 I still feel the little guy doesn't stand a chance. It must get very Dis-Heartening at times for some people with only 1 or 2 PC's to see themselves fall futher & futher behind the stats leaders at any project or even total project stats also ... @Paul, you have always done a fine job posting things, and I always read your posts with interest to see what you have to say ... |
|
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
first bunch done... now what?
(Message 8062)
Posted 13 Jun 2005 by STE\/E Post: only doing about 2300 Cobblestones a day ... I gotta do better than this! :) ========== The main reason you are only doing about 2300 a day is because the LHC Project gives out less credit than some of the other Projects do for the same amount of crunching time ... I'm the same way, I can only get between 2300 to 2400 a day here at LHC but at Einstein or CPND and some of the other Projects I can get between 3500 - 4000 a day ... |
|
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
first bunch done... now what?
(Message 7988)
Posted 6 Jun 2005 by STE\/E Post: Who say's it's done yet ... ??? ... ;) |
Next 20
©2024 CERN