1) Message boards : Number crunching : Host corruption solved? (Message 11044)
Posted 26 Oct 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
Just manually updated the wu's from overnight crunching and host info is now remaining intact here after a credit update.
2) Message boards : Number crunching : Host corruption (Message 10890)
Posted 25 Oct 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
Yep. Host location was gone. Reset to correct venue (home, school, work) and all came good.


This corrected my problem also.
3) Message boards : Number crunching : Host corruption (Message 10883)
Posted 25 Oct 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
This one, others seem to be ok.
http://lhcathome.cern.ch/show_host_detail.php?hostid=22011
Boinc client is 5.2.2 and last contact was within the last 2 hours.
4) Message boards : Number crunching : When Will LHC Server Be Updated to Handle BOINC 5.1.*? (Message 10592)
Posted 5 Oct 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
<blockquote>We are waiting to get another server which we will use for backup and testing purposes. We will install BOINC5 and MySQL4 on that and start alpha-testing. But I don't know when this will happen.

Anyway, we are not in hurry with BOINC5. We let other projects experiment with it for a while and see how they are doing:)
</blockquote>
LHC is now the only one of five projects I run which is not v5 compatible and this version will become the standard soon I think. Any updates on this?
5) Message boards : Number crunching : The Great LHC Hold-Up (Message 8311)
Posted 5 Jul 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
Double post
6) Message boards : Number crunching : The Great LHC Hold-Up (Message 8309)
Posted 5 Jul 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
> Here's the link to the paper:
>
> http://www.fatbat.dk/thesis/
>
> click on the THesis PDF download link to read it.
>
Yes lots of interesting reading there. This caught my eye. No need for optimised apps for LHC I think.

"The LHC simulation that was chosen to be the basis for LHC@home was SixTrack. SixTrack
has been developed over the last 20 years by Frank Schmidt, and is used by CERN and other
synchrotrons3 around the world to do beam studies. Like much of CERN's older software it
is written in Fortran. On the initiative of Eric McIntosh it is also used as part of the SPEC4
floating point benchmark. So CERN, when buying new computers, never have to estimate
how well a new processor will run SixTrack, but can look it up directly. Another added benefit
is that manufacturers will optimize their hardware and compilers to get the best benchmark
score, so modern CPUs and compilers are directly optimized for SixTrack performance."
7) Message boards : Number crunching : new work is here!!!! (Message 8205)
Posted 29 Jun 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
At last! Getting sixtrack 4.66 wu's on FC3 and 4.67 on Xp. And graphics on an ATI card. :)
8) Message boards : Number crunching : WU errors (Message 8016)
Posted 8 Jun 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
Done, if its not correct let me know.

Good luck with your project.
9) Message boards : Number crunching : WU errors (Message 8004)
Posted 7 Jun 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
> Digitalis ... can you send me your complete log file?
>
> p.d.buck@comcast.net
>
> Thanks ...
>
Be glad to, which particular file tho? (hangs head in shame)
10) Message boards : Number crunching : WU errors (Message 7998)
Posted 7 Jun 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
2 of my LHC wu's have exited with the following windows error message (Fortran),
"The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process (Createfile, erno=32, unit=92)."

When I accept this message the cc produces the folowing messages,

07/06/2005 17:45:35|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result wboinc7_v6s4hvnom__1__64.312_59.322__6_8__6__45_1_sixvf_boinc6270_0 (The access code is invalid. (0xc) - exit code 12 (0xc))
07/06/2005 17:45:35||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
07/06/2005 17:45:35|LHC@home|Deferring communication with project for 59 seconds
07/06/2005 17:45:35|LHC@home|Computation for result wboinc7_v6s4hvnom__1__64.312_59.322__6_8__6__45_1_sixvf_boinc6270_0 finished
07/06/2005 17:45:35||schedule_cpus: must schedule
07/06/2005 17:45:35|LHC@home|Resuming result wboinc7_v6s4hvnom__1__64.293_59.303__6_8__6__45_1_sixvf_boinc8769_4 using sixtrack version 4.67
07/06/2005 17:45:36|LHC@home|Started upload of wboinc7_v6s4hvnom__1__64.312_59.322__6_8__6__45_1_sixvf_boinc6270_0_0
07/06/2005 17:45:37|LHC@home|Finished upload of wboinc7_v6s4hvnom__1__64.312_59.322__6_8__6__45_1_sixvf_boinc6270_0_0
07/06/2005 17:45:37|LHC@home|Throughput 0 bytes/sec
07/06/2005 17:46:35|LHC@home|Sending scheduler request to http://lhcathome-sched1.cern.ch/scheduler/cgi
07/06/2005 17:46:36|LHC@home|Scheduler request to http://lhcathome-sched1.cern.ch/scheduler/cgi succeeded

I am using XPSP2 and the 4.44 cc (optimised for P4), all other projects are proceeding normally.
11) Message boards : Number crunching : v64lhc.D1-D2-MQonly-inj-no-skew-1s6_8588.2693_1_sixvf_51.zip...??? (Message 7135)
Posted 21 Apr 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
> > Got 29 wu's on a Linux (FC3) machine over the last few hours, non for XP.
> The
> > first three have completed in 10, 15 and 45 mins. The first 2 have shown
> up as
> > pending but the claimed credit is small. I noticed the app has also
> updated
> > from 4.64 to 4.66. No sign of a graphic in cc4.35.
> >
>
> Strange, all mine are 4.67
>
Linux is always different than windows ;) My Xp machine just downloaded 4.67 with 18 wu's so all is still well.
12) Message boards : Number crunching : v64lhc.D1-D2-MQonly-inj-no-skew-1s6_8588.2693_1_sixvf_51.zip...??? (Message 7133)
Posted 21 Apr 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
Got 29 wu's on a Linux (FC3) machine over the last few hours, non for XP. The first three have completed in 10, 15 and 45 mins. The first 2 have shown up as pending but the claimed credit is small. I noticed the app has also updated from 4.64 to 4.66. No sign of a graphic in cc4.35.
13) Message boards : Number crunching : Welcome back LHC (Message 5834)
Posted 22 Feb 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
Great to see the doors are open to the public at LHC again. But look at all those stern faces. :-)

14) Message boards : Number crunching : Unable to merge computers. (Message 5819)
Posted 22 Feb 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
AFAIK this is how it goes. In order to merge machines thet must have the same cpu and operating system. BOINC has changed the description of Intel cpus from "Intel(R)Pentium....." to "Genuine Intel(R) Pentium...." hence they are treated as separate machines. Your total credits will still be ok.

15) Message boards : Number crunching : Avatar upload broken - [solved] (Message 5763)
Posted 21 Feb 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
> Oops, I made a mistake. Please try again.
>
>
At Last :-)
16) Message boards : Cafe LHC : Testing new forum preferences (Message 5744)
Posted 21 Feb 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
Finally forum software is upto date to. Avatar upload is failing though.

Congrats to all at LHC for getting the show back on the road!




17) Message boards : Number crunching : Hello - Anybody back here from christmas holidays? (Message 5584)
Posted 15 Jan 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
> I think that after the message on the front page:
> LHC@Home 2nd status report announced. And looking into what is mentioned over
> there I feel that the users of your project deserve a little bit of more
> attention.
>
> All we are asking - or at least I am - is to get some news from the project
> officials so as to know if we just better forget about it or what,
>
> It is already mid-January, the Huygens got to Tit�n and we are all very
> excited but it surprises me that the kindness and politeness had in the past
> by the LHC group has now gone down the drain. A few words on the front page
> would be appreciated.
>
>
> Patience is a virtue
>
Your wait is over already!

18) Message boards : Number crunching : 3rd staus report issued, Liberto very happy (Message 5582)
Posted 15 Jan 2005 by Digitalis
Post:
;-)

19) Message boards : LHC@home Science : Is the project dead? (Message 5470)
Posted 8 Dec 2004 by Digitalis
Post:
Looks like an improved project will be back in early 2005.
See service announcements on Nov 01 '04 and Dec 07 '04.</p>



©2024 CERN