|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Running, high priority...
(Message 25577)
Posted 12 May 2013 by  Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: couple of thoughts ... Greetings Steve, That did the trick! I reset the buffer to .5 / .1 and now SETI WUs are again running while the LHCs are waiting. I shall leave it as is and see how things go. Thanks a lot Steve! :) Keep on BOINCing...! :) |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Running, high priority...
(Message 25575)
Posted 12 May 2013 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: Hi, Greetings Harri, My minimum and additional buffers are set to 5 days and 0.5 days respectively. They are set that way because of the server problems that SETI has on occasion. As I mentioned, SETI is my main project. Been with them from the start, before BOINC. I'm not sure about other projects, but SETI has a daily limit of 100 CPU and 100 GPU WUs. We cannot have more than 200 total in progress WUs in any given day. My shares are set to 100 for SETI and 0.5 for all other projects. I forgot to mention that I do run FreeHAL also concurrently with SETI. It is a non-CPU intensive project. Right now they are having some problem, server I believe. If you set your minimum buffer setting to 1 or greater, you will get more WUs per day. Thanks for responding. :) Keep on BOINCing...! :) |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Running, high priority...
(Message 25573)
Posted 12 May 2013 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: Greetings, Every time LHC (SixTrack) has WUs I get a bunch. Every time I get LHC WUs they run in high priority mode. Other projects I run do not get a chance to run until LHC runs out of WUs to send and I finish my cache of LHC WUs. My main project is SETI. I have 4 other projects I use as backup, LHC being one that I do not use primarily as a backup project. The other 3 are set to get no new tasks. I have my resource share set high for SETI and lower for all other projects. Is there some other setting I can change that will allow SETI and LHC to run concurrently? I have 8 SETI WUs, waiting to run, that have not had any CPU time for a few days now because LHC runs in high priority and I keep getting more WUs from LHC. I do not want to set LHC to get no new tasks; I want it to run along with SETI. Thank you for any consideration given to this problem. :) Keep on BOINCing...! :) |
|
4)
Message boards :
Team invites :
USS Riverside NCC-1660
(Message 16403)
Posted 24 Feb 2007 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: We are a chapter of STARFLEET, The International Star Trek Fan Association. This group is primarily located in Riverside, Iowa; James T. Kirk's future birthplace. Visit this link: USS Riverside NCC-1660 to join our team. Visit this link: USS Riverside NCC-1660 to check out/join our chapter. Dif-tor heh smusma -- Live long and prosper \V/_ |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Official Word on no more Work Units...!!!!
(Message 5328)
Posted 25 Nov 2004 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: BOLDED statements, made by me, do not constitute yelling on my part. They are made to differentiate between quoted text and what my statements are. > > "Low on work"? They,ve been "low on work" for over 2 weeks now. I have > had > There was much work in the last 14 day to be completed > If there was so much work to process in the last 14 days, then why did I get just one WU? BOINC has been logging on and trying to get WUs at least 15 times a day for the past 14. > > If it wasn't for SETI@Home and climateprediction, my PC would be off for > most > > of a 24 hour period. There'd be no need to run it 24/7 anymore. > > Good for your CPUs ;-) > My CPU is only about 5 months old so it should give me at least 2 years of reliable service. > Good for the electricity bill > I'm not concerned about lowering my electric bill. I only have the one PC that runs 24/7. I can afford that. > but now, since 48 H no more work > I do not understand what you mean by this last statement. L8R.... --- Rick A. - BOINCing right along now.... It can only get better.... "There is no fate except that which we create for ourselves." |
|
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Official Word on no more Work Units...!!!!
(Message 5309)
Posted 23 Nov 2004 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: > The official "word" from the main page is "low on work", so things aren't over > yet. > > "Low on work"? They,ve been "low on work" for over 2 weeks now. I have had one, that's (1), WU since finishing my last one on the 9th of this month. I believe that a more appropriate phrase would be "We are out of work indefinitely". If it wasn't for SETI@Home and climateprediction, my PC would be off for most of a 24 hour period. There'd be no need to run it 24/7 anymore. L8R.... --- Rick A. - BOINCing right along now.... It can only get better.... "There is no fate except that which we create for ourselves." |
|
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What's up with long winded WU crunches....?
(Message 4241)
Posted 24 Oct 2004 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: This jerk has got a lot of people pissed off at him. It has been suggested that we (on all project sites) completely ignore his posts and threads. Don't answer posts, don't go into threads he starts. Maybe he, and his father I found out, will get bored from the lack of attention and just go away, or (if it is at all possible) refrain from the crap they pull just to get that attention. L8R.... --- Rick A. - BOINCing right along now.... It can only get better.... "There is no fate except that which we create for ourselves." |
|
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What's up with long winded WU crunches....?
(Message 4206)
Posted 24 Oct 2004 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: Question answered.... Answer understood.... Thanks to all.... L8R.... --- Rick A. - BOINCing right along now.... It can only get better.... "There is no fate except that which we create for ourselves." |
|
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What's up with long winded WU crunches....?
(Message 4205)
Posted 24 Oct 2004 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: > > @ Guido: > > > > GO AWAY AND STAY > > AWAY..................................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</B> > > > > sometimes I would subscribe this post, but this time it was not applicable. > Guido was totally right.. > <a> href="http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&project=sah&userid=588229"> [b]Rick A. - BOINCing right along now.... It can only get better.... "There is no fate except that which we create for ourselves." |
|
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What's up with long winded WU crunches....?
(Message 4176)
Posted 23 Oct 2004 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: @ Guido: GO AWAY AND STAY AWAY..................................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</B> [b]EDIT: Oh, and you ARE a joke, Sir! Rick A. - BOINCing right along now.... It can only get better.... "There is no fate except that which we create for ourselves." |
|
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What's up with long winded WU crunches....?
(Message 4174)
Posted 23 Oct 2004 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: > Basically LHC@home gives out two types of workunits: Most are relatively short > units with "lhc1000" in their name, and some are quite long units called > "tunescan" with more turns to calculate. > > If the client comes to the conclusion that particles it calculates with would > crash into the walls of the LHC accellerator, the workunit is immediately > finished. If this happens right after a few turns, the WU is finished in 0 > seconds (almost). > Hey, thanks echoray! Now I have a better understanding. I was starting to think something was wrong on my side. Thanks again.... L8R.... --- Rick A. - BOINCing right along now.... It can only get better.... "There is no fate except that which we create for ourselves." |
|
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
@Markku -please stop creating new WU s
(Message 4172)
Posted 23 Oct 2004 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: > I don't agree with Guido. > > I think it's absolutely necessary to have more wu's available than people are > able to crunch. This paves the way for new members to add their CPU Power. (I > have 2 friends waiting to join LHC). > > :-) > > and Guido... I don't like your signature either. But that's propably just me. > > > rutsch mer doch dr Buckel na schofseggel > > > You think this is bad, you should see what he's been up to on the SETI site. He's been pissing off a lot of other users there, including me. L8R.... --- Rick A. - BOINCing right along now.... It can only get better.... "There is no fate except that which we create for ourselves." |
|
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What's up with long winded WU crunches....?
(Message 4161)
Posted 23 Oct 2004 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: When I first started with LHC, my WUs were crunching in a few minutes over an hour. Now I'm see WUs crunching in a few minutes and I even have had at least 1 that crunched in, get this, 00:00:00 minutes. I'm also getting WUs that crunch in 10 to 15 hours. Anyone know what's up with these long winded WU crunches and the few minute crunches? L8R.... --- Rick A. - BOINCing right along now.... It can only get better.... "There is no fate except that which we create for ourselves." |
|
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Anyone knows what these errors mean
(Message 3786)
Posted 14 Oct 2004 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: > LHC@home - 2004-10-12 20:26:54 - Deferring communication with project for 1 > hours, 0 minutes, and 0 seconds > Predictor@home - 2004-10-12 20:26:54 - Deferring communication with project > for 22 hours, 44 minutes, and 19 seconds > LHC@home - 2004-10-12 20:34:57 - Unrecoverable error for result > v64lhc1000profive21s12_14525.83_1_sixvf_2285_1 (Die Sitzung wurde abgebrochen. > (0xf0) - exit code 240 (0xf0)) > LHC@home - 2004-10-12 20:34:57 - Computation for result > v64lhc1000profive21s12_14525.83_1_sixvf_2285 finished > LHC@home - 2004-10-12 20:34:57 - Starting result > v64lhc1000profive21s12_14525.29_1_sixvf_2279_2 using sixtrack version 4.46 > LHC@home - 2004-10-12 20:39:56 - Unrecoverable error for result > v64lhc1000profive21s12_14525.74_1_sixvf_2284_2 (Es gibt keine untergeordneten > Prozesse, auf die gewartet werden muss. (0x80) - exit code 128 (0x80)) > LHC@home - 2004-10-12 20:39:56 - Computation for result > v64lhc1000profive21s12_14525.74_1_sixvf_2284 finished > LHC@home - 2004-10-12 20:39:56 - Starting result > v64lhc1000profive21s12_14525.11_1_sixvf_2277_1 using sixtrack version 4.46 > > > Sorry for the german. somehow my Client talks bi-lingual > > No problem. :-) I just got "Unrecoverable error...." message myself, tonight. I left a post for some insight. Sorry I can't help, but I figured it would be ok to let you know that you're not alone on this. L8R.... --- Rick A. - BOINCing right along now.... It can only get better.... "There is no fate except that which we create ourselves." Live Long and Prosper.... |
|
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
My first error message....
(Message 3785)
Posted 14 Oct 2004 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: Well, I finally got my first error message with regards to an LHC WU. I have just upgraded v4.09 core client to v4.13 tonight. I read the good and bad in the message boards on the SETI site and decided to do the upgrade. I got this error message about 15 minutes ago: LHC@home - 2004-10-13 21:26:27 - Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc1000prosix30s14_16584.15_1_sixvf_27908_2 (There are no child processes to wait for. (0x80) - exit code 128 (0x80)) In the "Work" tab it says "Computation error" under the "Status" column. I'm assuming that this may just be a WU problem. Any takers? L8R.... --- |
|
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is there actually going to be some work?
(Message 3481)
Posted 11 Oct 2004 by Siran d'Vel'nahr
Post: Well, I just uploaded my last WU almost 2 hours ago. Good thing there's CPDN, (which takes forever) and SETI@Home, which is having more than their fair share of problems. Watch for a new BOINC core client to come out. L8R.... --- |
©2024 CERN