1)
Message boards :
News :
Problems/Status 28th November, 2012 and PAUSE
(Message 25018)
Posted 19 Dec 2012 by arcturus Post: 3 weeks without an update, not even a 'yeah we're continuing to work on it' in typical Boinc noncommunicative fashion. Oh well it's not much different than other projects out there. I've become accustomed to it. |
2)
Message boards :
LHC@home Science :
article about what we\'re doing?
(Message 20569)
Posted 30 Sep 2008 by arcturus Post: http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/the_web/article4842964.ece |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
How long to wait before work is available?
(Message 13491)
Posted 1 May 2006 by arcturus Post: Relax, everything's going to be just fine. |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
How long to wait before work is available?
(Message 13482)
Posted 30 Apr 2006 by arcturus Post: I find it hilarious that some people get so bent outta shape over a simple thread resurrection now and then. How 'bout another, lol, or better yet ... keep this one going! |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Not HAPPY people.
(Message 13115)
Posted 23 Mar 2006 by arcturus Post: Let's talk about the other projects, shall we? Climate - the linux client is HOSED, the solution uncertain, and this after months of being told it's a hardware problem. Predictor - pathetic lack of communication, or maybe the 2004 update on the main page wasn't a good enough clue? Rosetta - the 1% bug from hell. Everyone's blue in the face talking about it. Not a pleasant thing to discover your remote boxen have been idle for weeks. Einstein - thumbs up! The Aksofp optimizing is impressive. SIMAP - looks ok, low points. Wish I spoke more German. Seti - we're alone. Live with it. |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Rosetta goes to full production.
(Message 10651)
Posted 8 Oct 2005 by arcturus Post: Be aware there's still issues with stuck work units with Rosetta, units which some people at first discounted as normal, even with 1% progession after 10 hrs lol. Everyone's got an opinion, right or wrong. |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
only 10 k WU's left
(Message 10051)
Posted 10 Sep 2005 by arcturus Post: <blockquote><blockquote>Why do we need a post here to tell us what we can read on the home page?</blockquote> Because there's always those who have nothing better to do. |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
information should not be that difficult
(Message 9830)
Posted 1 Sep 2005 by arcturus Post: I'm generally good for 250 - 300 points / day with Einstein. LHC & Predictor in the 180 - 220 category, the lowest of the boinc projects. |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
out of work ... for a long time ?
(Message 9562)
Posted 22 Aug 2005 by arcturus Post: </blockquote> Could that person interrupt his/her vacation or terminate it, just to come here and prepare the next work, please? thanks</blockquote> LOL, if I were that person here's my answer: HELL NO. |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Win vs Linux Completion Times
(Message 8922)
Posted 25 Jul 2005 by arcturus Post: Alright I've run under Linux for awhile and it's 5% - 15% slower depending on work unit with the longer units toward the 15% side. End of speculation. |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Win vs Linux Completion Times
(Message 8493)
Posted 13 Jul 2005 by arcturus Post: Any differences in completion between Win and Linux. One optimized better than the other? I know with Einstein Linux takes nearly 2x as long. |
©2024 CERN