|
41)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New Flood of WU's
(Message 15991)
Posted 3 Jan 2007 by  sysfried
Post: Amazingly: Up, 17661 workunits to crunch NEW WORK! |
|
42)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Not enough Disk space?
(Message 15990)
Posted 3 Jan 2007 by sysfried
Post: I get this message from the LHC server: Very interesting. What BOINC Client are you using? Can you switch to the Disk Usage and tell us what the BOINC Client says there? Regards, Sysfried |
|
43)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Statistics not updated
(Message 15988)
Posted 3 Jan 2007 by sysfried
Post: Well, first of all thank sysfried for your "effusive" response. Dear Aroigoli. First off, I want to apologize for my indeed very arrogant post. You state that you're with Boinc projects for a few years now and while you have a RAC higher than me, we have comparable total credits. I'd like to welcome you to the LHC project and gain some credits here, because this is a worthy project. But maybe you do agree with me that someone who doesn't have much credit and writes in his first post on a forum that stats are not exported while there are many threads here talking about this topic, should consider reading the frontpage news and forum threads first before asking for stats. I'd call this a "RTFM" Issue. Or in polite words: "your post was useless" . Can we agree on that? There are nice people around and I have to say that I was a bit upset this morning and next time, I won't check the forum until I get into a better mood so this won't happen again. To answer your three issues: 1. You can always ask, but if it's a topic that has been covered already, consider answering that specific thread rather than creating a new one. 2. Consider that a YES. LHC is the only forum where I've read ALL postings in the past years. Consider it a no for all the other projects I'm attached to. 3. I tried to use your total LHC credit and LHC posting count to state out that you're a LHC novice. Sincerely, Sysfried |
|
44)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Statistics not updated
(Message 15982)
Posted 3 Jan 2007 by sysfried
Post: I think statistics in BoincSinergy and BoincStats doesn't reflect the correct number of credits. Something similar occurred in nanohive project time ago and was caused by a change in the project's URL. Then someone (I supose the administrators of that project) informed the new URL to the admins of BoincStats. OMG! Is this for real? Someone with 39 Credits and 1 Post... Hey, AROIGOLI... STATS ARE NOT EXPORTED! READ THE F......ontpage of this site! Read the Forum before you bore us again with your presence! Sysfried |
|
45)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Interesting news article about CERN
(Message 15960)
Posted 2 Jan 2007 by sysfried
Post: excellent! thank you very much! |
|
46)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
I found an Anomaly
(Message 15959)
Posted 2 Jan 2007 by sysfried
Post: Was just looking through my results for this run and found something that needs to be checked out. It was not my client with the problem, but I thought it best to point it out. THis work unit is the one I'm refering to. The 4th one in, computer # 159657, has recieved only half the points of the 3 of us who made up the quorum. Never saw this happen before. If you look at the result Details it was marked invalid. Should it not then receive zero for this result? Interesting. But I think it's ok. The client reported data not knowing that it's false. The server compared the other results and found propably some mistake and marked it invalid. Still, the client had reported data and therefore is granted some credit. Three valid results have been found. I think it is fair that although that specific WU had one invalid result, still everyone does get some credit. Haven't seen that before. Sysfried |
|
47)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
A Miracle!
(Message 15924)
Posted 29 Dec 2006 by sysfried
Post:
Don't give up.. still 60k WUs ready to send.... |
|
48)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
A Miracle!
(Message 15921)
Posted 29 Dec 2006 by sysfried
Post: seems like nobody is awake yet.... Still 72k WU's ready to send.... Got my machines loaded and running. Cheers, Sysfried |
|
49)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New Flood of WU's
(Message 15883)
Posted 24 Dec 2006 by sysfried
Post: WaaHoooo!! Here we go again !! doh, i missed them merry x-mas anyways! cheers, sysfried |
|
50)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
@ new Admins
(Message 15872)
Posted 22 Dec 2006 by sysfried
Post: Dear Neasan & Co. I strongly recommend reviving the LHC@Home Alpha for your new server. There are experts around assigned for that project and I bet it would help you a big deal if you set up the Alpha with dummy WU's first so you can straighten out the startup hickups. Sysfried PS: I'm not a member of the LHC@Home Alpha, but I know that there are BOINC experts in that team. |
|
51)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Latest information on the move to UK
(Message 15871)
Posted 22 Dec 2006 by sysfried
Post: Dear Neasan. Thank you for your post. Relax. LHC @Home users are patient... sometimes.... Happy Holidays! Sysfried |
|
52)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New Flood of WU's
(Message 15858)
Posted 21 Dec 2006 by sysfried
Post: 20.000 and counting |
|
53)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New Flood of WU's
(Message 15855)
Posted 21 Dec 2006 by sysfried
Post: 10.000 ready to crunch... and rising! Sysfried |
|
54)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
A Miracle!
(Message 15854)
Posted 21 Dec 2006 by sysfried
Post: Another 3000 WU's just popped up! Grab'em!!!! Sysfried |
|
55)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Welcome QMUL Admins
(Message 15848)
Posted 20 Dec 2006 by sysfried
Post: Welcome QMUL Admins. Your first livesign has been noted! Users: Neasan & Alex Owen Merry X-Mas! Greetings, Sysfried |
|
56)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
30 hours of work availability - did u get some?
(Message 15846)
Posted 20 Dec 2006 by sysfried
Post: Maybe I can put some light on the short runtimes of many of the latest WU's. I've been with LHC for quite some time, so I know what it's about..... The time calculated as "calculated time" depends on how many "turns" you've got with each WU. This is a variable only the Admins change prior to creating WU's. The Sixtrack software simulates electrons travelling within the LHC. Once in a while one or more electrons crash into the wall and are subtracted from the calculation and this leads into less electrons travelling in the next turn. So when you start with X electrons at, let's say 1.000.000 turns, you get Z time needed. This will vary on your cpu. Of course faster cpu's will calculate the one million turns faster than a slow one. If too many electrons crash, the whole simulation ends immediately or is calculated within minutes if not seconds. I hope this helps. Sincerely, Sysfried PS: @River~~ any corrections to my info? |
|
57)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
A Miracle!
(Message 15836)
Posted 19 Dec 2006 by sysfried
Post: MAGIC is right! More work on the horizon ... Absolutely... I just grabbed a bunch of WU's... Sysfried |
|
58)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New Work so get it while you can....!
(Message 15798)
Posted 12 Dec 2006 by sysfried
Post: Morgan -- Propably enough WU's from other projects in the queue... Or ask River~~ ;-) Cheers, sysfried BTW: due to heavy PC re-construction.... I missed the batch of new work... *booohoooo* |
|
59)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
/stats/ empty
(Message 15735)
Posted 29 Nov 2006 by sysfried
Post: indeed how about a: /block_wu-submission <user> or a: /reset_score <user> or .... /slap <include block_wu-submission><include reset_score> <user> *BEG* sysfried |
|
60)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
/stats/ empty
(Message 15732)
Posted 29 Nov 2006 by sysfried
Post: Do something please, we want statistics on Boinc Synergy have you even tried to read this thread? Or the NEWS on the front page? Sorry about the lack of kindness, but this is getting anoying... Sysfried |
Previous 20 · Next 20
©2024 CERN