21)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Gone in a flash!
(Message 16807)
Posted 3 May 2007 by sysfried Post: Whoa! 30K or so work units, and I didn't even get one. they were not even peanuts... 15 min runtime on a 2.6 GHz P4 per WU.... I'm getting really upset about all of this now. |
22)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Counting the days
(Message 16805)
Posted 3 May 2007 by sysfried Post: 41 days since the last official word from the admins.... :-( |
23)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Lifesign?
(Message 16734)
Posted 24 Apr 2007 by sysfried Post: It's getting quiet here in the forum. Is there a life sign from the admins at all that I've missed? 10.000 work units... that's no life sign, dear admins. That's a burp! How about a real life sign? Regards, Sysfried |
24)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Lifesign?
(Message 16701)
Posted 13 Apr 2007 by sysfried Post: It's getting quiet here in the forum. Is there a lifesign from the admins at all that I've missed? Regards, Sysfried |
25)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc farms.
(Message 16582)
Posted 20 Mar 2007 by sysfried Post: here's what I have at my fingertips: 4 x quad socket Xeon 7110 (total 8 cores per machine at 2.6 GHz) 10 x dual socket Xeon 5110 (total 4 cores per machine at 1.6 GHz) and a bunch of 2.8 GHz P4D's.... |
26)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Please note: this project rarely has work
(Message 16377)
Posted 20 Feb 2007 by sysfried Post: YAY!!! it's sticky!!!!!! Let's hope people will read it before asking for stats or new WU's..... :-) |
27)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
LHC credits not showing up in cross-project stats
(Message 16314)
Posted 13 Feb 2007 by sysfried Post:
@Anyone who understands Neasan and feels like he's patient enough to let them do what they think they have to do, to have it done right, scream "HERE" <<--*screams* HERE! |
28)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
LHC credits not showing up in cross-project stats
(Message 16298)
Posted 12 Feb 2007 by sysfried Post: when will LHC ever export stats again.....if ever? not in your lifetime! I think Neasan should give us a warning before exporting Stats. Some members here are so desperately waiting for the stats export, they might suffer a heartattack when they finally find their stats being exported. Neasan, should we start a "let's collect money so we can buy valium for the members that only want stats" thread here? Cheers, Sysfried |
29)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Versions for x86_64 platforms avaible ?
(Message 16276)
Posted 8 Feb 2007 by sysfried Post: Here comes a newbie question: Quick answer: NO. Long answer: If your OS doesn't support 64-Bit, it won't let 64-Bit Applications run. Don't worry about that pricey chip. ALL Boinc Projects have 32 bit Applications. Some Apps have been optimized to utilize extra functions like MMX or SSE (and/or SSE2/3). Your CPU will do just fine and help whatever projects you choose to join. Sincerely, Sysfried |
30)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Versions for x86_64 platforms avaible ?
(Message 16272)
Posted 7 Feb 2007 by sysfried Post: .... too many quotes... could you reformat your own postings and trimm them a bit? thank you! |
31)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
That was fast
(Message 16240)
Posted 6 Feb 2007 by sysfried Post: well, those WU's got sent out quick.... impressive.... sounds like many machines attached banging the LHC front door all the time... |
32)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
That was fast
(Message 16220)
Posted 5 Feb 2007 by sysfried Post: Yeah, I got 10 WU's across 4 machines attached. Propably some kind of test run... We'll see.. but ... LHC is still alive.. :-) nice to see that... :-) |
33)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Welcome QMUL Admins
(Message 16107)
Posted 11 Jan 2007 by sysfried Post: ... :-) Thanks to the new Admins for their recon' of Chrulle and Ben, and the load of Info. Btw, did anyone see the "test 1 test 2 test" lines on the frontpage a few min before they posted their big News post? Funny! ;-) Sysfried |
34)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Totally Disgusting
(Message 16051)
Posted 5 Jan 2007 by sysfried Post: I wouldn't bother too much. LHC needs 3 valid results. With one result claiming way too much, the granted results are lower. The "cheat" client doesn't do any good here. It doesn't hurt either. No need to worry. Well, I officially admit that I did use the "cheat client" as well. While I've re-installed most of my machines, I think I've upgraded my hosts to the regular client. My 2 cents about the credits @ lhc... if a high claimed credit causes the granted credit to rise, the other participants also gain from this, because their granted credit is above the claimed. Sincerely, Sysfried |
35)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Totally Disgusting
(Message 16045)
Posted 5 Jan 2007 by sysfried Post: I wouldn't bother too much. LHC needs 3 valid results. With one result claiming way too much, the granted results are lower. The "cheat" client doesn't do any good here. It doesn't hurt either. No need to worry. Regards, Sysfried |
36)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
SOME greedy users
(Message 16013)
Posted 3 Jan 2007 by sysfried Post: MY PRECIOUS!!!!!! LHC WUs!!! ;-) |
37)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
SOME greedy users
(Message 16006)
Posted 3 Jan 2007 by sysfried Post: ... Agreed! |
38)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
SOME greedy users
(Message 16004)
Posted 3 Jan 2007 by sysfried Post: Looking at many users beeing greedy. As of right now, there still is work available... And it has been for more than 5 hours... Where is the problem? There is a 500 WU's per cpu & Deadline limit which won't let people download 10.000 wu's..... Sincerely, Sysfried |
39)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Not enough Disk space?
(Message 15998)
Posted 3 Jan 2007 by sysfried Post: I'm using BOINC client version 5.7.5. looks good to me... No clue other than suggesting the 5.8.0 client: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/boinc_5.8.0_windows_intelx86.exe Have you tried to move some data off the partition and check what boinc does? Regards, Sysfried |
40)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Statistics not updated
(Message 15997)
Posted 3 Jan 2007 by sysfried Post: Appologies accepted Sysfried, Dear Aroigoli. No, I'm not an admin. At least not with the LHC project. :-) The FAQ would indeed help. I can't recall who it was, but we did have some kind of wiki for LHC... anyone remember that? Regards, Sysfried |
©2024 CERN