|
1)
Message boards :
ATLAS application :
What ATLAS simulations are we running?
(Message 38568)
Posted 17 Apr 2019 by  Chilean
Post: Does Theory use the same concept for the simulations as ATLAS and CMS? I really like Theory for their statistics (I can easily keep track on the number of events being simulated...). ATLAS and CMS are sort of "blind" regarding your output, so you can't keep track beyond the RAC that BOINC gives you (which can be bogus since a WU could "finish" with the VM machine doing nothing). |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
VirtualBox 6.0.0 released
(Message 38567)
Posted 17 Apr 2019 by Chilean
Post: All good here so far. |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Number of simulations done?
(Message 33786)
Posted 11 Jan 2018 by Chilean
Post: Is there a way to check how many jobs you've done (or simulations done in the case of ATLAS) so far without having to open the graphics within BOINC? |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is this project still alive?
(Message 27740)
Posted 9 Apr 2016 by Chilean
Post: It is indeed alive. Every so often I find huge batches of WUs on my BOINC manager waiting to be crunched. I run almost exclusively Rosetta and LHC SixTrack, with priority given to LHC due to its intermittent supply of WUs. |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Graphics
(Message 25629)
Posted 31 May 2013 by Chilean
Post: I used to love the LHC@home's graphics, is there any way to incorporate them back? |
|
6)
Questions and Answers :
Sixtrack :
Linux
(Message 6129)
Posted 26 Feb 2005 by Chilean
Post: My linux box takes about 19 sec. to finish a WU. (On the client not the website) (No errors, no nothing it just succeds in 19 sec!!) Is this noraml?? |
©2024 CERN