1) Message boards : Number crunching : Stuck resullts in database?? (Message 13997)
Posted 15 Jun 2006 by Osku87
Maybe you won't get the info asking the same thing from time to time.
2) Message boards : Number crunching : O.K., I'm New! No Work?? (Message 13974)
Posted 13 Jun 2006 by Osku87
Yeh i cant get any work either:

Haven't you read the other messages? Try. Maybe you'll learn something... ;)
3) Message boards : Number crunching : I think we should restrict work units (Message 13943)
Posted 11 Jun 2006 by Osku87
1fast6: Haven't you read that the projects big idea for the moment is to NOT release work all the time. Is it any sense to waste computer time for meaningless crunching?
4) Message boards : Number crunching : I think we should restrict work units (Message 13891)
Posted 5 Jun 2006 by Osku87
By the way, what do you mean by "...a proper reason???"

Like being a modem (or other with dial up and minute fee line) user.

I'm sorry if someone took the tone of my message too serious. It was ment to wake some guys up... ;)

As MB_Atlanos said there have been a couple of times when too much of server load has gotten the servers upside down.
5) Message boards : Number crunching : I think we should restrict work units (Message 13878)
Posted 4 Jun 2006 by Osku87
Thanks to your clear explanation, I raised my cach for .01 to 10 days.
And yup,
As soon as there was work to do, I was able to get a bunch of it to work on.

Please, don't do that.

Engouraging people to keep that kind of a cache without a proper reason on fast computers will bring only a problems. As we have seen servers at Cern (or where ever they are) won't stand the excessive amount of downloads what around 80 computers downloading WUs for ten days cause.

So don't come here whining when server is down and you wan't download work. You know the reason exactly.
6) Message boards : LHC@home Science : disk space (Message 13695)
Posted 22 May 2006 by Osku87
And check also use at most (something) percent disk space. It should be something as high as 95%.
7) Message boards : Number crunching : Overclocking Failed (Message 13515)
Posted 5 May 2006 by Osku87
I can't see your point in here, but...

But overclocking is very dangerous ( i know what i say ) because you overclock everything CPU, Chipset,
Memory, temperature increase and performance decrease

Overclocking is safe when you know what you are doing. If you overclock your CPU by changing FSB you may or may not (depends on your hardware) overclock your memory and chipset. You are right that temperature increases. If you do it right performance won't decrease instead it will increase.

you also have constant false result in memory
so wu result will be automaticly false.
Lhc@home describe it in site.

If you point a thing you could also link to it. I think sensible overclocking won't return false results.

Internet prevent from overclocking RAM

I would like to know how Internet prevents from overclocking.

but it is a PC3200 400Mhz memory.
when i reboot my bios say overclocking failed.

Usually this is from processor and it may appear rarely also with standard CPU clock. You may also have bought bad memory if problem came after installing the new RAM.
8) Message boards : Number crunching : Please merge my computers (database crash) (Message 13459)
Posted 26 Apr 2006 by Osku87
Please merge my computers

Can't you do it by yourself? Just choose another of your computers you want to merge and on the bottom of that page click link named merge this computer and choose the another.
9) Message boards : Number crunching : Work caches (Message 13241)
Posted 5 Apr 2006 by Osku87
We do *not* know the size of this user's cache. We know the number of WU issued and not yet returned, and that is not the same thing.

In that you are right, but work cache can be estimated by counting the downloaded WUs and looking the average run time from previous ones (as this user has returned those).

I won't be counting all but I presume that he has downloaded about 250 WUs at once. His average run time is about 2 and a half hours. So he would crunch those workunits 26 days. Still the deadline comes after 9 days.
10) Message boards : Number crunching : Work caches (Message 13236)
Posted 4 Apr 2006 by Osku87
Why are some people keeping enormous work caches? Like this guy in here One computer

A bit over 500 WUs on a Pentium 4 3.0 GHz. Is there any sense?
11) Message boards : Number crunching : total data transmission (Message 13220)
Posted 31 Mar 2006 by Osku87
Dotsch: Thak you for your correction. The WU size I mentioned was estimated from Rosetta which has quite much bigger WUs.
12) Message boards : Number crunching : CPU Quota when no work. (Message 13218)
Posted 31 Mar 2006 by Osku87
I'm not sure, but it should split like 66% and 33%.
13) Message boards : Number crunching : total data transmission (Message 13211)
Posted 31 Mar 2006 by Osku87
Maybe he wanted to know the sizes of data packets. One of my results was about 30 kB.

The wu size is something like a couple of megabytes.
14) Message boards : Number crunching : We are going again. (Message 13201)
Posted 30 Mar 2006 by Osku87
I think scientist are working whole time, but doing perhaps some studies that won't need the crunching capacity of LHC. So there won't be so much work. How to continue the current LHC study depends on what the results will be. So only a bunch of new work units will be released from time to time.

btw. We ran out of work again and pretty fast.
15) Message boards : LHC@home Science : What's Up? (Message 13118)
Posted 23 Mar 2006 by Osku87
I would ask you for second time to look at the Number crunching forum but I won't because some won't still understand. There has been quite much debate about this phenomen.

The idea of hole BOINC is that you can take several projects and crunch them simultaneusly. When one project is out of work computers keep crunching others and return to the one when work is available in there. Many of cruchers have lost this idea when all the other projects have work 24/7. LHC:s nature isn't just that anymore.

It's up to you whether to stay or vanish but hope you understood.
16) Message boards : LHC@home Science : What's Up? (Message 13099)
Posted 21 Mar 2006 by Osku87
I suggest that you glance the number crunching forum. There is a quite good explanation about this situation. The work will be quite irregular from now on and so it has been already a while.

And still I'm pointing that the previous study is not completed yet (workunits still in progress) and scientist need also time to analyse the results of previous studies to make a new bunch of work.
17) Message boards : Number crunching : Not HAPPY people. (Message 13067)
Posted 19 Mar 2006 by Osku87
As MikeW said this projects nature is to be without work for sometime and then there comes a new bunch of work. That's why BOINC makes possible to keep several projects. So I would suggest that you keep LHC in your projects with 99% work share. Then take for example Rosetta or Einstein (or which is your second favourite project) with 1% share and last take Predictor or another of those above (or which is your third favourite project) as third with 0% of work share. So your machines have always work. Even when a couple of projects are without work or under maintenance.
18) Message boards : LHC@home Science : What's Up? (Message 13062)
Posted 17 Mar 2006 by Osku87
You must also notice that all of the work units haven't been returned yet. This may be the one reason for delay.
19) Message boards : Number crunching : Question for Chrulle ... (Message 13031)
Posted 14 Mar 2006 by Osku87
Maybe a bit after the previous work is completely done.
20) Message boards : Number crunching : Would this be a good computer for Numbers? (Message 12816)
Posted 21 Feb 2006 by Osku87
Mushkin is a very famous of its overcolockers memory. One of the best memory manufacturers in the world. I don't know anything about that Green series, but if it's as good as Mushkins more expensive memory I would buy it straight away.

Memory markets have changed since christmas I see. Here in Finland Kingston Value Ram PC2700 costs 45,90e and PC3200 49,90e. On christmas it was reverse.

I would buy those Mushkins, but lets see what others think about this.

Edit: Message board didn't like my mighty euro characters.

Next 20

©2024 CERN