|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Up and Running
(Message 11476)
Posted 25 Nov 2005 by Michael Milan Post: This afternoon I saw something like, "out of work, no workunits in porgress". I come back to check a few hours later and: Up, out of work 7997 workunits in progress :O Damn you guys are too fast! |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
project priority ideas.
(Message 11431)
Posted 22 Nov 2005 by Michael Milan Post: Methinks you're suffering from work unit withdrawal symptoms. ;) |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
new work eta?
(Message 11423)
Posted 21 Nov 2005 by Michael Milan Post: Personally I want to know what on Earth is taking crunchers so long to get the last 100 WUs in. :-P |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
project priority ideas.
(Message 11379)
Posted 16 Nov 2005 by Michael Milan Post: Hmmm. About the switch every hour thing. How about if you simply change the value in your preferences to switch longer than 60 minutes? If it takes, say, 10 hours to complete a workunit, why not set it to "switch every 12 hours"? Then it would crunch an entire workunit before checking whether it's time to switch. Would it work? |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Up and Running
(Message 11362)
Posted 15 Nov 2005 by Michael Milan Post: Server Status Up, out of work 28251 workunits in progress 37 concurrent connections Another famine before the feast, hmmm? Has LHC@home always run like this? |
|
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Up and Running
(Message 11225)
Posted 6 Nov 2005 by Michael Milan Post: Up, out of work 40821 workunits in progress 34 concurrent connections And so the river runs dry once more. |
|
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
ERROR :/
(Message 11161)
Posted 1 Nov 2005 by Michael Milan Post: I wonder how long we'll have to wait before we get new work. |
©2025 CERN