21) Message boards : Number crunching : /stats/ empty (Message 15577)
Posted 19 Nov 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
lol twice the size of seti's lol seti's is 1.6Gb unzipped

If thats the case I bet Zain (our team Captain) is glad, the seti takes the server over 3 hours to process (when it works)
22) Message boards : Number crunching : Projects to mix with LHC (Message 15576)
Posted 19 Nov 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
River wrote:


ha ha looks like i whine alot.



"If you don't mind" blah is exactly the way to put it to a newcomer. If they do mind those possibilities they will be warned in advance - and in the long run that will cut out a lot of whining.

River~~


We can but hope.
btw fwiw i'v been reading the forums @ docking, having to manualy adjust # of stacks for a every different linux/unix host and the translation through wetware on how. it is interesting to note 1 thread 165 long was to help 1 person get their project up and running.

if you always wanted to learn linux thats the project to join.

sidebar {1} why quote not in a box
23) Message boards : LHC@home Science : WU's (Message 15575)
Posted 19 Nov 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
:) wu are few and far between got a few last week and a few a month ago

accross a number of pc's that is
24) Message boards : Number crunching : Projects to mix with LHC (Message 15560)
Posted 19 Nov 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
Heres a few Projects Missed so far ( and maybe why )



ha ha looks like i whine alot. I'v had no problems with Tampaku (not just saying that because i'v been their uotd 13 times)

VTU Xtrem & Prime Grid I'v had no problems with either
and Docking is too new to tell

25) Message boards : Number crunching : Did everyone get work 02 Nov UTC? (Message 15502)
Posted 18 Nov 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
@ William :embarass: meant 1/4 cpdn sap is more than 1/2 + wcg cancer

over 1/4 are rosetta ralph hashclash

Project specs and Hardware requirements (by Honza)
26) Message boards : Number crunching : LHC Creating new user hosts at a high rate (Message 15501)
Posted 18 Nov 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
PovAddict wrote:

My last host ID is 2859945, but user IDs are in the factor of thousands. So we have around a thousand hosts per user average!


2860130 :lol: slowing down now (I thought i'd fixxed that pc too)

Wish I was 'Average' :lol: long as these new pc dont show up on my power bill

27) Message boards : Number crunching : A Miracle! (Message 15500)
Posted 18 Nov 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
:) got lucky all the way around here too :)

28) Message boards : Number crunching : Did everyone get work 02 Nov UTC? (Message 15464)
Posted 15 Nov 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
:) pokeing so many holes in so many machines as i see go through here, and remembering what/where is too much for me, last week i used a combo of putty from winxp and 'places' 'connect to server' from a linux machine to do some BOINC'n with some opterons :) .i bam for the remote and keep a variety on all the part time machines



William Timbrook wrote:

Now that I'm on the soapbox, what's the deal with joining all the projects? (Again, I really don't want to know,) it seems to me instead of concentrating on some core ones (3 (lhc, predictor, and simap) of my 8 have recently usually been out of work), the people who do a couple of work units and then move on are only taxing the project / statics systems.



William




of 35 projects 8 have less work than lhc :lol: 3 have deadlines of today, 4 require more than 1/2G ram so 5 machines cant do them.

that leaves about 7 'core' and 7 not the not are alpha projects which need a variety of machines os and setup which are the ones i'm doing now and the <lhc any chance i get :D



i am aiming for 80+ % at all projects atm.

P.S. Thanks River for the bv tip anywayz tho and 1 p.c. had 3 wu from chess on the 2nd ( forgot that last week lol too)
i see we need a new system for xml stats eh, seti stats are getting to big :lol:
29) Message boards : Number crunching : Did everyone get work 02 Nov UTC? (Message 15415)
Posted 11 Nov 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
Doh. i was thinkin' 'connect every' .I do many projects so I keep my caches real small cuz i don't like it when i have pages of wu to scroll through to see what's running (or if)
30) Message boards : Number crunching : Did everyone get work 02 Nov UTC? (Message 15409)
Posted 10 Nov 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
a sensible idea imho

PovAddict wrote:
There are users with 10-day caches trying to grab all they can. What about limiting the cache server-side? On my project, I limited users to have at most 3 workunits in progress (per CPU), and I could get all work done much faster, plus all users got something. On LHC, I can see many users don't get anything (because a few get all) and also I can see "Workunits in progress ~10000" for quite a long time. Scientists have to wait weeks to get work finished, while there are lots of computers "idle" in LHC.


two of five machines connected and indebted highly got work;
    *one was nnw because of sztaki
    *two had no excuse for not getting work



my 'backoff' is < 4 hours , lhc is set alike pirates and simap, and i get wu on all boxes ,when they 'burst'

31) Message boards : Number crunching : Is the user base/project participants growing a bit too large, for our server? (Message 12931)
Posted 4 Mar 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
Server Status

Up, 59829 workunits to crunch
57975 workunits in progress
41 concurrent connections


the 'in progress' is up now
the servers just have fits at the onset of new work
32) Message boards : Team invites : Sig Test (Message 12725)
Posted 13 Feb 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:

33) Message boards : Number crunching : Host 107106 trying to cheat? (Message 12711)
Posted 11 Feb 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
i have win 98 se machines that when running both predictor and lhc, if both projects have pre-empted work they will still add time to cpu time irregardless of which other project is actualy useing the cpu.

this results in high credit claims
34) Message boards : Team invites : Team BOINC Synergy (used to be seti synergy) (Message 12669)
Posted 7 Feb 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
BOINC Synergy is a great international team. It is filled with helpful friendly members and has great stats.

They also have a stats page that is open to everyone, and have customised signatures like mine.

Come check us out at www.boincsynergy.com


llama009


mine too lol
35) Questions and Answers : Sixtrack : No work (Message 12667)
Posted 7 Feb 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
Up, 39794 workunits to crunch
47598 workunits in progress
41 concurrent connections

36) Message boards : Number crunching : Up and Running Again (Message 12666)
Posted 7 Feb 2006 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
Up, 39794 workunits to crunch
47598 workunits in progress
41 concurrent connections

8)

37) Message boards : Number crunching : Host corruption (Message 10954)
Posted 25 Oct 2005 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
1 oF 3 hosts

BOINC 4.45

http://lhcathome.cern.ch/show_host_detail.php?hostid=670
38) Message boards : Team invites : SETI Synergy (Message 3153)
Posted 3 Oct 2004 by Profile Morgan the Gold
Post:
Have a look at http://www.setisynergy.com/ SETI Synergy's Champion pages.


http://www.setisynergy.com/stats/teams_lhc.php?team=97&project=lhc SEE SETI Synergy's LHC team


http://www.setisynergy.com/stats/teams_lhc.php?team=97&project=lhc JOIN SETI Synergy's LHC team


Previous 20


©2024 CERN