1) Message boards : Number crunching : Very short Intel computation vs. normal AMD (Message 20111)
Posted 10 Sep 2008 by Joe
Post:
I ran both machines for a couple of years before my dissatisfaction over other things finally prompted me to mothball the AMD machine. To this day, I won\'t even consider an AMD processor-based machine.

Memory doesn\'t serve me well enough to be able to quote exact clock speeds and whatnot, but I do remember that I came to the same conclusion as others on this thread... that the mathmatic units on the two supposedly-comparable chips were wildly out-of-sync, with the Intel chip being the better of the two, by far.

Cheers

Bob in Boise

On some projects, the L2 cache size plays a very big factor in WU runtimes, even when FLOPs in benchmark test are similar. This could be another example of that.


AMD\'s have so little of this, becuase of the way they communicate with the chipset. They dont actually need as much L2 Cache as Intel Processors.



©2024 CERN