1) Message boards : Sixtrack Application : XBoinc (Message 51385)
Posted 6 days ago by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
One year ago the latest version of Xboinc.
Waiting for restart.....
2) Message boards : CMS Application : CMS@Home -- jobs update (Message 51360)
Posted 10 days ago by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
I have some running at -dev but that site needs to be poked with a stick since it is just blank pages for everything so we can't see what is going on.


Still waiting for lhc-dev website....
3) Questions and Answers : Getting started : Problems on LHCathome-Dev (Message 51344)
Posted 17 days ago by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
Finger crossed...

And happy new 2025!!
4) Questions and Answers : Getting started : Problems on LHCathome-Dev (Message 51340)
Posted 19 days ago by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
The site of LHC-dev seems to be "freezed".
All blanck pages. No forum, no user's profile, etc
5) Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc and Docker (Message 51273)
Posted 12 Dec 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
web and scheduler: enable plan classes for BUDA

If you make a variant of a BUDA app for a plan class
(e.g. NVIDIA GPU with CUDA)
this ensures that jobs submitted to that variant are sent
only to capable hosts,
and that the host usage and projected FLOPS are set correctly.

On the web side, we add a <plan_class> element to workunit.xml_doc.
This gets sent to the scheduler.

On the scheduler this required some reorganization.
As the scheduler scans jobs, it finds and caches
a BEST_APP_VERSION for each app.
This contains a HOST_USAGE.

In the case of BUDA, the host usage depends on the workunit,
not the app version.
We might scan several BUDA jobs
they'll all use the same APP_VERSION,
but they could have different plan classes
and therefore different HOST_USAGE.
6) Message boards : LHC@home Science : LHC schedule changed (Message 51150)
Posted 26 Nov 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
Simulation of heavy ions ended.

The integrated luminosity of the proton run, which denotes the number of collisions recorded, reached almost double the best performance achieved in previous runs, with124 inverse femtobarns for both the @atlasexperiment and the @cmsexperiment. Later, during the 17-day lead-ion run, an integrated luminosity of 1.98 inverse nanobarns was delivered to the @alice_experiment, an equivalent amount to last year.

Particles are set to return to the accelerator chain at the beginning of March 2025 and to the LHC at the beginning of April.
7) Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc and Docker (Message 51149)
Posted 26 Nov 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
the singular reason to switch Windows machines from VBox to Docker, which is unnecessary anyway, would be to shut you up.


Please, admins, could you suspend this account?
8) Message boards : Number crunching : New virtualbox wrapper (Message 51137)
Posted 25 Nov 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
Release notes of the new version (26208)
9) Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc and Docker (Message 51097)
Posted 19 Nov 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
You consider that a "vast" difference. That pretty much settles the validity of the rest of your complaint. Enjoy your whinge.


Oh, my gosh.
I'm NOT whinging.
I'm only saing that in the vast part of the Boinc projects, the majority of computational power comes from Windows machines.
This is a FACT. Is it a problem for you?

But it is only a secondary point and, again, you're OFF TOPIC.
The thread is about Docker and the advantages it does.
10) Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc and Docker (Message 51073)
Posted 16 Nov 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
Not even "ultra-vast majority".

Yes, it is. But i think this is not the topic of the thread.

You know all those VBox apps are running Linux inside the VMs, right.

So? Do you know the difference between VirtualBox on WIndows and Docker/WLS on Windows?
11) Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc and Docker (Message 51072)
Posted 16 Nov 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
Personally, I run the Native apps.


You are a lucky man.
I have only Windows computers.
And, if i can give more computational power to the boinc project only with simple change of the virtualization platform, i'm happy...
12) Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc and Docker (Message 51068)
Posted 16 Nov 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
Yes, you said ALL.


Ok, not all, but the ultra-vast majority.
So, what is the problem with Docker?
13) Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc and Docker (Message 51066)
Posted 15 Nov 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
Not true.

Not false.

LHC CMS app
Windows Gflops: 5978
Windows Gflops: 2454

LHC Sixtrack app (hystorical)
Windows Gflops: 156
Linux Gflops: 30

LHC Theory App (Virtualbox)
WIndows Gflops: 3464
Linux Gflops: 935

Lhc-Dev CMS App
Windows Gflops: 193
Linux Gflops: 42

Lhc-Dev Theory (Virtualbox)
Windows Gflops: 12
Linux Gflops: 11

Rosetta@home
Windows Gflops: 82.117
Linux Gflops: 24.011

Amicable Numbers
Windows Gflops: 3.642.449
Linux Gflops: 1.119.574

Gerasim@home
Windows Gflops: 4992
Linux Gflops: 2376

Milkyway@Home
Windows Gflops: 61.278
Linux Gflops: 19.172

ODLK
Windows Gflops: 3506
Linux Gflops: 3029

Sidock@Home
Windows Gflops: 38627
Linux Gflops: 16500


Do you want me to continue?
14) Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc and Docker (Message 51062)
Posted 15 Nov 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
Simply not true for LHC@home. See statistics page.


Only for LHC.
If you see ALL others Boinc project, are ALL windows majority.

P.S.
By the way: what's the problem with Docker? it's a possibility that doesn't take anything away....
15) Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc and Docker (Message 51061)
Posted 15 Nov 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
Virtualbox runs just fine. I see no need for Docker.


Do you see the benchmarks between VirtualBox and Docker? Don't you like to have access to gpu for vm? No? Don't you like that, at administrative side, it's easier to maintain?
16) Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc and Docker (Message 51050)
Posted 14 Nov 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
Don't need no stincking Docker on Linux. Boinc runs just fine as is!


This feature is for Windows pcs (that are the absolute majority), but it's also for linux machine (if you have NOT a native linux app).
17) Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc and Docker (Message 51048)
Posted 13 Nov 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
They called it BUDA (BOINC Universal Docker Application)
18) Message boards : LHC@home Science : LHC schedule changed (Message 51027)
Posted 8 Nov 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
Started simulations with lead ions
19) Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc and Docker (Message 50962)
Posted 28 Oct 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
Seems that the work is progressing...

- New philosophy: always query the presence of software (WSL distros, Docker)
even if client config doesn't allow its use.
Send the config info to scheduler, and enforce it there.
- New philosophy: allow running jobs in any WSL distro
except those disallowed in the config

- Add plan class support for WSL and Docker app versions

- client: query the libc version of WSL distros.
The plan class entry for a WSL app version
can specify a min libc version.

- wsl_wrapper: add --min_libc_version cmdline arg
(should match plan class spec)
20) Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc and Docker (Message 50672)
Posted 1 Oct 2024 by [VENETO] boboviz
Post:
Boinc developers are working to integrate natively Docker on Boinc platform.
Benefits: portability, faster, use of gpus, easier maintenance, etc

Are admins working with boinc developers to see if it is suitable for LHC@Home?


Next 20


©2025 CERN