Status 10th May, Version 451.07

Author	Message
Tom95134 Send message Joined: 4 May 07 Posts: 250 Credit: 826,541 RAC: 0	Message 26445 - Posted: 14 May 2014, 19:55:50 UTC Suspended all other Projects to get LHC work. First Task running now. Windows 7 x64, INTEL i7 ID: 26445 · Reply Quote

Tom95134 Send message Joined: 4 May 07 Posts: 250 Credit: 826,541 RAC: 0	Message 26451 - Posted: 15 May 2014, 2:57:11 UTC - in response to Message 26445. Suspended all other Projects to get LHC work. First Task running now. Windows 7 x64, INTEL i7 Crunch.. Crunch.. Crunch.. Got a bunch. ID: 26451 · Reply Quote

tullio Send message Joined: 19 Feb 08 Posts: 708 Credit: 4,336,250 RAC: 0	Message 26478 - Posted: 18 May 2014, 8:15:30 UTC I am running 3 tasks, but the estimated time to completion is too short. They should take about 40 hours on my Linux box running also an Ubuntu Virtual Machine with Test4theory@home. Tullio ID: 26478 · Reply Quote

alvin Send message Joined: 12 Mar 12 Posts: 128 Credit: 20,013,377 RAC: 0	Message 26479 - Posted: 18 May 2014, 8:21:19 UTC - in response to Message 26478. Last modified: 18 May 2014, 8:23:03 UTC I am running 3 tasks, but the estimated time to completion is too short. They should take about 40 hours on my Linux box running also an Ubuntu Virtual Machine with Test4theory@home. Tullio some yes, some no date status run/CPU Credit App 18 May 2014 Completed and validated 156.52/45.24 0.93 SixTrack v451.07 (pni) 18 May 2014 Completed and validated 163.84/45.12 5.65 SixTrack v451.07 (pni) 18 May 2014 Completed and validated 191.22/49.53 0.83 SixTrack v451.07 (pni) 18 May 2014 Completed and validated 106.25/29.05 2.96 SixTrack v451.07 (pni) 18 May 2014 Completed and validated 12,240.89/12,057.72 156.95 SixTrack v451.07 (pni) 18 May 2014 Completed and validated 25,800.10/25,601.88 630.86 SixTrack v451.07 (pni) ID: 26479 · Reply Quote

Ray Murray Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 29 Sep 04 Posts: 281 Credit: 11,859,285 RAC: 0	Message 26489 - Posted: 18 May 2014, 17:11:20 UTC Oops. What's happened here, and here?, although I did miss out here with the Max-time error. ID: 26489 · Reply Quote

Eric Mcintosh Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0	Message 26491 - Posted: 18 May 2014, 19:52:11 UTC - in response to Message 26489. Hi Ray, first two look OK to me??? Third one is the problem I am trying to fix. Eric. ID: 26491 · Reply Quote

Ray Murray Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 29 Sep 04 Posts: 281 Credit: 11,859,285 RAC: 0	Message 26492 - Posted: 18 May 2014, 22:50:49 UTC It was the excessive amount of credit that caught my eye compared with similar run times, although it's nice to have longer running wus again, eg. this one where the credits are more reasonable and I have another one where the credits are far too high. All different wingmen. I like to earn my credits fairly and wouldn't like to be accused of cheating somehow. I also have this one, marked as inconclusive, where the wingman finished in 2 seconds against my 10+hours, admittedly on a virtual Linux machine which is a bit slower because of the overheads involved. On further investigation that looks like maybe an issue with that host as all their WUs only seem to last a couple of seconds (with only one line in the stderr as if the wu never got started) and has 1099 pending, 1722 inconclusive, although there have been a few valid ones yesterday and today. ID: 26492 · Reply Quote

Eric Mcintosh Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0	Message 26493 - Posted: 19 May 2014, 0:31:22 UTC - in response to Message 26492. Thanks again Ray; I shall be looking into all this. I am hoping to reset credit business today as suggested by Richard. Eric. ID: 26493 · Reply Quote

LHC@home