Message boards :
Number crunching :
HTTP error after de/reattach
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 6 Sep 08 Posts: 116 Credit: 11,097,403 RAC: 5,330 |
I have just been taking a look at some of your messgaes And thanks, bigmac, for your perstistence. Many here will remember your efforts with LHC@home from the start. John. |
Send message Joined: 20 Sep 05 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,212,559 RAC: 17 |
Resetting does not work: 17-09-2011 10:16:28 | LHC@home 1.0 | Resetting project 17-09-2011 10:16:30 | LHC@home 1.0 | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 17-09-2011 10:16:30 | LHC@home 1.0 | Requesting new tasks for CPU and NVIDIA 17-09-2011 10:16:31 | LHC@home 1.0 | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 17-09-2011 10:16:31 | LHC@home 1.0 | Error in request message: no start tag 17-09-2011 14:21:23 | LHC@home 1.0 | update requested by user 17-09-2011 14:21:26 | LHC@home 1.0 | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 17-09-2011 14:21:26 | LHC@home 1.0 | Not reporting or requesting tasks 17-09-2011 14:21:28 | LHC@home 1.0 | Scheduler request completed 17-09-2011 14:21:28 | LHC@home 1.0 | Error in request message: no start tag |
Send message Joined: 6 Jul 06 Posts: 108 Credit: 663,175 RAC: 75 |
Resetting does not work: It is suggested that you not reset but Detach and then Re-attach using the url http://lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch/sixtrack/ It originally didn't work for me but after some more Admin adjusting all is now working, pity the credit is so poor (mostly 10 or less cr/h). Conan |
Send message Joined: 20 Sep 05 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,212,559 RAC: 17 |
But I have already returned work under the new url, there should be no need to detach. |
Send message Joined: 20 Sep 05 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,212,559 RAC: 17 |
But I have already returned work under the new url, there should be no need to detach. Well, change that to: you definitely should detach/re-attach. New WUs are pouring in now. Thanks! |
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 209 Credit: 1,482,496 RAC: 0 |
But I have already returned work under the new url, there should be no need to detach. Except if you read the admin posts (they might be in another thread), they moved to a new server and made an error by leaving an old reference in one file, once boinc gets certain info it caches it, and the only way to clear this info is detach, then reattach which will get all new info that does not contain the errant info. |
Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for that valuable inut. How did you know our problem? I am ignorant of WWW networks caching and all that but thanks. Eric. |
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 209 Credit: 1,482,496 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for that valuable inut. How did you I think Igor told me or posted it. - I tired quite a few solutions myself, some seemed to work but that may have been by luck that that client did not cache the piece of info throwing it into a spasm, proabally through non recent contact with the project. The only real thing that seems to work is detach+reattach. |
©2024 CERN