Message boards : Number crunching : work units??
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next

AuthorMessage
Lessa

Send message
Joined: 18 Jun 06
Posts: 3
Credit: 15,968
RAC: 0
Message 17983 - Posted: 25 Sep 2007, 4:20:32 UTC - in response to Message 17978.  

I will help you :D

Thanks. The email came from root-ph-hep@qmul.ac.uk


Thanks!
ID: 17983 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile caspr
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Apr 06
Posts: 89
Credit: 309,235
RAC: 0
Message 17992 - Posted: 28 Sep 2007, 16:22:31 UTC

@ Dagorath.... I've been keeping up with this thread since I asked my question about setting the cache on my box's. I'm not that eager to to get more WU's even though it would be nice. I think I'll just "kick the client" more often rather than "hammer the server"! But thanks anyway! LOL!
A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory


ID: 17992 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
KAMasud

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 06
Posts: 108
Credit: 22,919
RAC: 0
Message 18024 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 11:02:12 UTC


:) i see the format has changed ;) good one Alex and Neasan :) just wait and see the response to this one:(
Regards
Masud.
ID: 18024 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile CoM

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 04
Posts: 42
Credit: 10,488,896
RAC: 39
Message 18026 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 11:13:35 UTC

on 3 computers i got 1 WU for each, seems to be a new way of distribute work equally over all users
ID: 18026 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
KAMasud

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 06
Posts: 108
Credit: 22,919
RAC: 0
Message 18027 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 11:16:56 UTC
Last modified: 12 Oct 2007, 11:19:38 UTC

;) Yes and the message part i dont think you read as yet ;) lmho
10/12/2007 3:42:49 PM|lhcathome|Message from server: Not sending work - last request too recent: 486 sec
:( My protons crashed on take off ;)
Regards
Masud.
ID: 18027 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Seventh Serenity
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Sep 04
Posts: 51
Credit: 72,804
RAC: 0
Message 18029 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 11:23:47 UTC - in response to Message 18027.  

;) Yes and the message part i dont think you read as yet ;) lmho
10/12/2007 3:42:49 PM|lhcathome|Message from server: Not sending work - last request too recent: 486 sec
:( My protons crashed on take off ;)
Regards
Masud.

I've just posted this in the Questions & Answers area under Windows as I'm getting this on both of my machines too.
ID: 18029 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Jul 06
Posts: 107
Credit: 511,942
RAC: 0
Message 18033 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 11:32:35 UTC

Yeah I am getting that as well, I did manage to get 1 WU but I can't get any more even though there is over 11,000 WU's in the queue.
ID: 18033 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
alpina

Send message
Joined: 3 Aug 05
Posts: 49
Credit: 141,848
RAC: 0
Message 18035 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 11:42:23 UTC

I'm getting the same message while I have completed my workunit already. I guess the project leaders are trying to give everyone a bit of work instead of a few who get everything. I support this idea completely but it would be nice if the hosts who have allready returned results and have a empty queue could get some new work as well.


BOINC.BE: The team for Belgians and their friends who love the smell of glowing red cpu's in the morning
ID: 18035 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
KAMasud

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 06
Posts: 108
Credit: 22,919
RAC: 0
Message 18036 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 11:45:39 UTC


LoL :) i second that motion :) must be their answer to Dagorath ;)
Regards
Masud.
ID: 18036 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Seventh Serenity
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Sep 04
Posts: 51
Credit: 72,804
RAC: 0
Message 18037 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 11:52:16 UTC

I don't think it's even per computer, but per IP address. Only my X2 got a work unit which crashed as the x64 client isn't working properly. My P4 has had absolutely nothing.
ID: 18037 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile caspr
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Apr 06
Posts: 89
Credit: 309,235
RAC: 0
Message 18038 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 12:08:10 UTC

It MUST be per IP address. Out of 3 boxs, 2 got 1WU each, one of those wu's errored out after 3secs, and it dosnt matter how much I "kick the client" I cant get a wu on the box that didnt receive 1, or a wu to replace the one that errored out.
A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory


ID: 18038 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
GNH

Send message
Joined: 19 May 07
Posts: 4
Credit: 64,180
RAC: 0
Message 18039 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 12:17:56 UTC

It looks like they might have shut it down to fill the queue? It seems to be growing by a few per second as I'm doing refreshes.
ID: 18039 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Harri Liljeroos
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Sep 04
Posts: 442
Credit: 23,673,863
RAC: 14,118
Message 18040 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 12:29:42 UTC

Getting this message:

lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:06 38 Sending scheduler request: Requested by user
lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:06 39 Requesting 67266 seconds of new work
lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 40 Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505]
lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 41 Message from server: No work sent
lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 42 Message from server: (reached daily quota of 2 results)
lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 43 Deferring communication for 11 hr 34 min 57 sec
lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 44 Reason: requested by project

ID: 18040 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Alex Owen
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 19 Dec 06
Posts: 22
Credit: 28
RAC: 0
Message 18041 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 12:49:22 UTC

Hi,
We are releasing a Press Release today to officially Launch the LHC@HOME move to the UK. So we might expect some new users to turn up over the weekend! Please be nice to them ;-)

So that they have a fighting chance of getting a job to process we changed some of the settings including the daily quota.

We will change things back to normal over the first few days next week...

Happy Crunching (if a little bit throttled for a few days!)

Alex Owen
ID: 18041 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
GNH

Send message
Joined: 19 May 07
Posts: 4
Credit: 64,180
RAC: 0
Message 18043 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 12:59:14 UTC - in response to Message 18040.  

Getting this message:

lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:06 38 Sending scheduler request: Requested by user
lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:06 39 Requesting 67266 seconds of new work
lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 40 Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505]
lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 41 Message from server: No work sent
lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 42 Message from server: (reached daily quota of 2 results)
lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 43 Deferring communication for 11 hr 34 min 57 sec
lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 44 Reason: requested by project


Anyone want to lay odd how long that'll last? For some reason, I thought BOINC projects were interested in performance. Um I've got an idea... Let's build a supercomputer and then put throttles on it.
ID: 18043 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile CoM

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 04
Posts: 42
Credit: 10,488,896
RAC: 39
Message 18044 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 13:12:14 UTC

its funny if i think of my quadcore... 2 WU arent much.
ID: 18044 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [B^S] Dora

Send message
Joined: 27 Apr 06
Posts: 26
Credit: 13,559
RAC: 0
Message 18045 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 13:19:48 UTC

I got 1 wu on each of my computers that have it as a project. Something that has NEVER happened before and I am guessing I will get another for each.

And I also suspect that they will up the quota when there is more work, which, judging from their post on the home page today, is quite likely ;-)

Looks good to me....

Dora




ID: 18045 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
GNH

Send message
Joined: 19 May 07
Posts: 4
Credit: 64,180
RAC: 0
Message 18046 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 13:20:05 UTC - in response to Message 18044.  

its funny if i think of my quadcore... 2 WU arent much.

Yep, I've got an 8 core at at work, a dual core laptop and two single cores at home. Oh well, looks like after the weekend, the open the gates.
ID: 18046 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Perle
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 04
Posts: 81
Credit: 32,632,526
RAC: 13,314
Message 18047 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 13:42:04 UTC

I attached a few more multi core machines and they were able to get 1 or 2 work units.

But it does show the up/dl server as disabled.

bugger!
ID: 18047 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Tom Philippart

Send message
Joined: 19 Dec 06
Posts: 10
Credit: 10,462
RAC: 0
Message 18052 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 14:23:18 UTC - in response to Message 18047.  

10/12/2007 4:15:35 PM|lhcathome|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work
10/12/2007 4:15:35 PM|lhcathome|Requesting 689074 seconds of new work
10/12/2007 4:15:40 PM|lhcathome|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505]
10/12/2007 4:15:40 PM|lhcathome|Message from server: Not sending work - last request too recent: 3401 sec
10/12/2007 4:15:40 PM|lhcathome|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
10/12/2007 4:15:40 PM|lhcathome|Reason: no work from project

There must be something wrong!
ID: 18052 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : work units??


©2020 CERN