Message boards :
Number crunching :
Host corruption
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 . . . 7 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 506 Credit: 118,619 RAC: 0 |
Another corrupted host: LV-01, host 30627 now thinks it is at venue 40015757312! Last connected at 15:23 UTC. Running BOINC 5.2.2. It also thinks it has exceeded its quota of 100 results per day. although it's only had about 2 Gaspode the UnDressed http://www.littlevale.co.uk |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 8 Credit: 349,947 RAC: 0 |
Corrupted hosts on my account 37059 57498 34303 34351 57463 65799 57431 36703 24898 57462 37063 36752 All Windows machines were running BOINC 4.45, Linux 4.45 or 4.72. ALL machines were upgraded to 5.2.2 (Windows) or 5.2.4 (Linux) yesterday. I do have some hosts which are not showing corruption. I will see if they reset over the next 24 hours. *EDIT* Detach/reattach worked for some hosts, have nice new host records which are correct. Can't merge them with the "old" host records though as the corruption affects the CPU and Operating System fields. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Jul 05 Posts: 65 Credit: 369,728 RAC: 0 |
somehow host 57189 is corrupted again. host 47322 what happened: - initial state: corrupt info - report results: correct info - credit granted: corrupt info - manual update: correct info* *except for the following fields: Average download rate Unknown Average turnaround time 0 days Maximum daily WU quota per CPU 1/day this leads me to believe the communication between the server and the clients is not where the problems lies in this case. [edit] I have been able to duplicate this with host 57272 and 47319 [/edit] |
Send message Joined: 22 Jul 05 Posts: 7 Credit: 67,923 RAC: 0 |
And another one: host 42203: The quota droped to 2/WU per day ... |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 157 Credit: 82,604 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I have one host with ID 21726, last contact as from stdoutdae.txt was 2005-10-24 15:56:11 [LHC@home] Scheduler request to http://lhcathome-sched1.cern.ch/scheduler/cgi succeeded Last contact based on website is as from 24 Oct 2005 13:56:06 UTC Contact before the first time that project was down was 2005-10-24 11:46:00 [LHC@home] Scheduler request to http://lhcathome-sched1.cern.ch/scheduler/cgi succeeded Boinc version 5.2.2 but boinc.exe replaced by truxsoft's version 5.3.1 I suspended LHC@Home until now. Will try an update and see what it gives. |
![]() Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 163 Credit: 1,682,370 RAC: 0 |
Mine too. hostid: 24068 last contacted: 25 Oct 2005 4:47:37 UTC OS: Linux 2.4.19 hostid: 40264 last contacted: 25 Oct 2005 4:44:58 UTC OS: Linux 2.6.11 Both run BOINC 4.19 The 3rd host 21204 is OK. I was wondering why UL/DL was possible, although home page showed "shutdown for maintenance".... HTH Michael Team Linux Users Everywhere ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 157 Credit: 82,604 RAC: 0 ![]() |
After doing the "update" in Boinc Manager 2005-10-25 18:33:15 [LHC@home] New host venue: 721168 Oops, ?? Still the same host ID on the website, and with correct info. After closing Boinc and starting over 2005-10-25 18:40:44 [LHC@home] Computer ID: 21726; location: 721168; project prefs: default Oops, location: 721168 ?? Edit1 I did an update on LHC@Home preferences. The location was set as "Home", but choose once again the "Home" as default location . Update on Boinc Manager, no effect. Edit2 Went to the details of my host, location was set as "---", choose "Home" as location, did an update in Boinc Manager. Result: 25/10/2005 18:53:01|LHC@home|Computer ID: 21726; location: home; project prefs: default All is well now. The earlier 'location: 721168' was thus coming from the fact there was previously no location defined for my host in the host details. |
Send message Joined: 22 Jul 05 Posts: 7 Credit: 67,923 RAC: 0 |
Hey, all entries are back and look good! Thanks! another corrupted host: 44537 |
![]() Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 163 Credit: 1,682,370 RAC: 0 |
Just want to confirm the info from this post. After reporting some results from host 21204 (which was OK) host info got corrupted too. I did a manual update afterwards and host info was restored. HTH Michael Team Linux Users Everywhere ![]() |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 8 Credit: 349,947 RAC: 0 |
Host 68191 just returned a result (4068306) at 18:09 UTC from BOINC 5.2.4 (Linux) which corrupted the host record. Result is fine, was nominated canonical result and granted credit. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Jul 05 Posts: 65 Credit: 369,728 RAC: 0 |
Host 68191 just returned a result (4068306) at 18:09 UTC from BOINC 5.2.4 (Linux) which corrupted the host record. let me guess, you also got credit for that result, right the second when you reported it? |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 8 Credit: 349,947 RAC: 0 |
Yup, must edit quicker, my bad :) |
Send message Joined: 15 Jul 05 Posts: 17 Credit: 16,521 RAC: 0 |
Both of my hosts have become somewhat corrupted. Host name: REFLECTION Host ID 43015 - last contact 14OCT2005 17:30:20 UTC Host ID 67449 - last contact 25OCT2005 02:06:01 UTC The other info seems correct Host name: TWONEYVILLE Host ID 39924 - last contact 14OCT2005 17:14:14 UTC Host ID 67437 - last contact 25OCT2005 02:56:04 UTC The info for 67437 is really messed up. Both hosts are running BOINC v. 4.45 I was about to install 5.2.2 on one of the machines, but I think I will hold off until this gets sorted out. ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Jul 05 Posts: 65 Credit: 369,728 RAC: 0 |
this seems to confirm my suspicion that the problem isn't in host-server-communication but somewhere between the validator and the database (see some of my earlier posts) I already send a mail with what I have found to Chrulle. Results are still being validated and credit is given to the correct hosts, so I guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens next. |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 8 Credit: 349,947 RAC: 0 |
Good job, I'm not too fussed really, only provided my dodgy hosts because Chrulle asked for them. Work is still being done, BOINC isn't crashing, so a wee bit of patience - hopefully they have enough information now to track the problem down. |
![]() Send message Joined: 29 Aug 05 Posts: 42 Credit: 27,102 RAC: 0 |
On my initial look at my hosts, nothing was awry. I manually updated to report and pull work, and that host went corrupt (I had apparently used my quota of 200 WU/day--I don't get close to that!). Another manual update brought things back to normal, and I was able to download work again. A couple minutes later, I suspended Seti@Home, and LHC downloaded another few WUs. No corruption there. That sounds to me like the problem is only in the report uploading portion of the cycle. Or else it has to do with the manual update. I've set NNW for now to see if I can't force BOINC to do nothing but upload results. We'll see what happens. I run CC 4.72. (j) James |
Send message Joined: 15 Jul 05 Posts: 17 Credit: 16,521 RAC: 0 |
Host name: TWONEYVILLE 10/24/2005 10:55:57 PM|LHC@home|Sending scheduler request to http://lhcathome-sched1.cern.ch/scheduler/cgi 10/24/2005 10:55:57 PM|LHC@home|Requesting 0 seconds of work, returning 1 results 10/24/2005 10:55:58 PM|LHC@home|Scheduler request to http://lhcathome-sched1.cern.ch/scheduler/cgi succeeded 10/24/2005 10:55:58 PM|LHC@home|New host venue: 0 I like the new host venue of 0. *sarcasm off* I'll get the info off my other host and post it here. ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 157 Credit: 82,604 RAC: 0 ![]() |
After doing the "update" in Boinc Manager After reporting the first result, info went corrupt again :-( |
Send message Joined: 30 Sep 05 Posts: 6 Credit: 9,260 RAC: 0 |
After doing the "update" in Boinc Manager @Thierry: I had a similar experience except in the sequence of events: I downloaded a WU and got msg that new venue was 7465.77. Being aware of this thread I went to the detail host info and saw that a previously OK set of data was now corrupted. I changed the venue to home and did boinc update which reset the venue. When the WU completed and reported, the host details were again reset to gibberish and the venue was back to ---. I reset it again and am waiting to see if the next report due will corrupt it again. I'm using Boinc 4.45. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 157 Credit: 82,604 RAC: 0 ![]() |
After reporting the first result, info went corrupt again :-( And after using the "update" button, info came back to normal. |
©2025 CERN